Missouri Labor Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 411
Gardner v. Echopark Automotive, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Elloyd C. Gardner
Defendant:
Echopark Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Mecke v. Bluegreen Vacations Corporation et al
as 6:2023cv03047
Plaintiff:
Denise Mecke
Defendant:
Bluegreen Vacations Corporation, Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc., Russell Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Houdek v. Caseys Marketing Company
as 2:2023cv04013
Plaintiff:
Robin Houdek
Defendant:
Caseys Marketing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Derendinger v. Huebert Fiberboard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04179
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Derendinger
Defendant:
Huebert Fiberboard, Inc. and W.R. Meadows, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCaul v. Great Mines Health Center
as 4:2022cv01185
Plaintiff:
Judith McCaul
Defendant:
Great Mines Health Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
United States of America v. Ultimate Roofing, L.L.C.
as 4:2022cv00671
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ultimate Roofing, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
White v. Jones
as 4:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
LeTrice White
Defendant:
Barbara Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Francis v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00617
Plaintiff:
Mika L. Francis
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Weger v. Cushman & Wakefield U.S., Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00609
Plaintiff:
Luis Weger
Defendant:
Mastercard International Incorporated and Cushman & Wakefield U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4323 Veterans Re-employment Rights Act (VRRA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
