North Dakota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 398
Muhammad et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Kariem Qaadir Muhammad, Jamual Famin Muhammad, Danny Dermill Daniels and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Denver, City of and Aurora, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torkelsen v. Braun
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Steven A. Torkelsen
Defendant:
Colby Braun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. State of North Dakota et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Robert Williamson
Defendant:
State of North Dakota, Chad Pringle, Dave Krabbenhoft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdikarim v. Fargo, City of et al
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Fargo, City of, Chief of Police Fargo, ND, Chief of Police West Fargo, ND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Allen
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Chris Baker
Defendant:
Christopher Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Macbolan v. Valley Rental et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Baker Chris Macbolan
Defendant:
Valley Rental and Eagle Crest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Peach v. White Cloud et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
David Coty Peach
Defendant:
C.O. FNU White Cloud, C.O. FNU Herba and Sgt. FNU Wise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akouala v. AGU Logistic et al
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Christian Akouala
Defendant:
AGU Logistic, Court of Works. Comp., Mac Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Glaum v. Emerado, City of et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Glaum
Defendant:
Emerado, City of and Police Officer Daniel J. Lund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Trump
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
