Ninth Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 70,091
Sims v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
Ray P. Sims
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7405 IRS: Action for recovery of refunds erroneously made
Menzel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv02400
Plaintiff:
Erik Menzel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Schaus v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Phillip Gregory Schaus
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wampole v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wampole
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Toussaint v. O' Malley
as 3:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Rudy Toussiant
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 rs Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Kelley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Mark Kelley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Alfonso Lepe v. Martin J. OMalley
as 5:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Lepe
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Noe Valdez v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv03339
Plaintiff:
Noe Valdez
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Janis Lynn Martinez v. Martin O Malley
as 8:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Janis Lynn Martinez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Munger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Curtis Edward Munger
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
