US District Court for the Northern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,122
Bailey v. Borda
as 3:2024cv02307
Petitioner:
Jasper W. Bailey
Respondent:
Warden Ron E. Borda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia-Lopez v. People
as 5:2024cv02253
Petitioner:
Joel Garcia-Lopez
Respondent:
People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lockett v. Matteson
as 5:2024cv02189
Petitioner:
Jamie Lockett
Respondent:
Giselle Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla v. People of the State of California
as 4:2024cv02183
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams
as 3:2024cv02097
Petitioner:
Antoine Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gage v. People of the State of California
as 4:2024cv02100
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eugene Gage
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Govenor Newsome And Marin County
as 1:2024cv02135
Petitioner:
Paul Samuel Johnson
Respondent:
Govenor Newsome And Marin County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pina v. Santa Clara County Superior Court
as 3:2024cv01976
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jonathan Pina
Defendant:
Santa Clara County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Oseguera v. Corpus
as 3:2024cv02000
Petitioner:
Daniel Oseguera
Respondent:
Christina Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corderick v. Warden C.S.P. Solano
as 3:2024cv01939
Petitioner:
Dewayne Gage Corderick
Respondent:
Warden C.S.P. Solano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
