US District Court for the Southern District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 5,198
Mamaril v. USAA Federal Savings Bank
as 3:2023cv02201
Plaintiff:
Amiel Jared P Mamaril
Defendant:
USAA Federal Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Stark v. Navigate Real Estate Co.
as 3:2023cv02166
Plaintiff:
Collette Stark
Defendant:
Navigate Real Estate Co.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Akkawi et al v. Sadr et al
as 3:2023cv02168
Plaintiff:
Diana Akkawi, Yasmin Akkawi, Katelyn J. Button and others
Defendant:
Kasra Sadr, Car Law Firm, The Sadr Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514 A Civil Action to Protect Against Retaliation in Fraud Cases
Stark v. Dream Stays SD, LLC
as 3:2023cv02165
Plaintiff:
Collette Stark
Defendant:
Dream Stays SD, LLC
Ewing v. Camus et al
as 3:2023cv02154
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Pablo Garces Camus and Dboss Funding, LLC
Ewing v. Isaac et al
as 3:2023cv02127
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Isaam Isaac and Fun in the Sun Tours, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
ACON Laboratories Incorporated v. Alltests Clinical Solutions LLC et al
as 3:2023cv02086
Counter Defendant:
ACON Laboratories Incorporated
Defendant:
ALLTESTS Clinical Solutions LLC, Alltests North America LLC and Unknown Parties
Stark v. Chimney Sweeps, Inc.
as 3:2023cv02036
Plaintiff:
Collete Stark
Defendant:
Chimney Sweeps, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Stark v. One Touch, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv02004
Plaintiff:
Nicole Stark
Defendant:
One Touch, LLC and Roohil Hamid
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Apex Systems, LLC v. Sperber et al
as 3:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Apex Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Kimberly J. Sperber and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Fraud & Related Activity in Connection with Computers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
