Southern District of California Torts - Property Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 747
Huntzinger v. Aqua Lung America, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01146
Plaintiff: Ralph A. Huntzinger
Defendant: Aqua Lung America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Fraud
Stetler v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2015cv01110
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Orlando v. Sears Roebuck and Co. et al
as 3:2015cv01089
Plaintiff: Robert Orlando
Defendant: Sears Roebuck and Co. , Whirlpool Corporation , Does 1 through 30
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Carmichael v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2015cv01064
Plaintiff: Kirk M. Carmichael
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Truth in Lending
McCue v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2015cv01059
Plaintiff: Garry L. McCue
Defendant: Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Property Damage
Demison v. GSCM Ventures, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01067
Plaintiff: Danielle Demison
Defendant: GSCM Ventures, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Phalen v. GK Development, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01046
Plaintiff: Robert Phalen
Defendant: GK Development, Inc., GK Retail Properties Fund III, LLC, GK Securities, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Cadrobbi et al v. Nationstar Mortgage, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2015cv01029
Plaintiff: Paul A. Cadrobbi, Cyhnthia L. Cumming
Defendant: Nationstar Mortgage, L.L.C., Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Fraud
Simo et al v. Seaworld Entertainment, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01022
Plaintiff: Valerie Simo , Joyce Kuhl , Elaine Browne
Defendant: Seaworld Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Fraud
Constantino v. Top Rank, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01025
Plaintiff: Joseph Nick Constantino
Defendant: Top Rank, Inc., Robert Arum, Todd Duboef and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Fraud
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.