Idaho Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 3,641
Martin v. Valley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00362
Petitioner:
Jeffery E. Martin
Respondent:
Warden Randy Valley and Idaho State Commission of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Valley, et al.
as 1:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Michael Collins
Defendant:
Warden Valley, Sergeant Barrows, Governor Brad Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crookedarm v. Coby, et al.
as 1:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Ian Jack Crookedarm
Defendant:
Marcus Coby, Elizabeth Hernandez, Maria Coby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Judge Nye
as 1:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
Judge Nye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Winmill
as 1:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Lacey Mark Sivak
Defendant:
Judge B Lynn Winmill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Carter, et al.
as 1:2023cv00342
Petitioner:
Adam Russell Freeman
Respondent:
Tom Carter, Twin Falls County Sheriff and Twin Falls County Adult Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nevarez v. The Idaho State Correctional Center et al
as 1:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Conrad Cesar Nevarez
Defendant:
The Idaho State Correctional Center, Warren T. Davis and ATC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. USA
as 1:2023cv00340
Petitioner:
Jordan Michael Drake
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dillard v. Ada County Jail
as 1:2023cv00337
Petitioner:
Jonathan Dillard
Defendant:
Ada County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Richardson
as 1:2023cv00335
Petitioner:
Erick Virgil Hall
Respondent:
Tim Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
