District Court Cases in Idaho
Cases 31 - 40 of 12,242
Valverde v. Postal Service (U.S.) et al
as 1:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Paul Valverde
Defendant:
Postal Service (U.S.) and Alan Castellanoz
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Reeder v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Clayton E. Reeder
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fitzmorris v. AG Manufacturing & Technology, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Scott Fitzmorris
Defendant:
AG MANUFACTURING & TECHNOLOGY, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
B.A. v. Robertson, et al.
as 4:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Minor Child Brayden Albertson and United States Postal Service
Defendant:
Kathy Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Bartholomew v. Kralik, et al.
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Darin L. Bartholomew
Defendant:
Dusty Kralik, Shane Grady, Todd McDevitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wintrode v. Carter et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Tom Carter, Chris Hogan, Randall Buffalo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivak v. Nye
as 1:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Lacey Mark Sivak
Defendant:
David C. Nye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
