Montana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,338
Danley v. Christian et al
as 6:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Daria Danley
Defendant:
Clayton Christian, Dr. Waded Cruzado and Kyleen Breslin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hatch v. State of Montana et al
as 9:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jeffery D. Hatch
Defendant:
State of Montana, Montana Supreme Court and Montana 11th Judicial District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kast v. Erbacher et al
as 9:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Caitlin M. Kast
Defendant:
Patrick Erbacher and City of Missoula
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grigg v. Wilson
as 9:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Peter Grigg
Defendant:
Judge Dan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Held v. State of Montana et al
as 1:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee Held and Brenda-Lee Held
Defendant:
State of Montana, Greg Gianforte, Austin Knudsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans With Disabilities Act
Pasak v. Montana Child Protective Service et al
as 4:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Patricia Pasak
Defendant:
Montana Child Protective Service, Mikalyn Strecker Munoz and Ashley Harada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Iron Horse v. Whitehip
as 1:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Tiana Iron Horse
Defendant:
Garey Whitehip
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
