US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 3,565
McReynolds v. USA
as 2:2023cv00371
Petitioner:
Randy Del McReynolds
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kane v. Waldo
as 2:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Ali Kane and Abdoulaye Toumbou
Defendant:
Waldo and Troy Stull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Coyote Ridge Corrections Center
as 1:2023cv03198
Plaintiff:
Roderick Deray Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Coyote Ridge Corrections Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimble v. Yakima County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv03200
Plaintiff:
Tatum Kimble
Defendant:
Yakima County Jail and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Yakima County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv03199
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Brown
Defendant:
Yakima County Jail and Washington Corrections Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mulamba v. Jackson
as 1:2023cv03196
Petitioner:
Reuben Denis Dwazi Mulamba
Respondent:
Rob Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winterer v. United States
as 1:2023cv03197
Plaintiff:
Jared Anthony Winterer
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphreys v. Securus Phone et al
as 4:2023cv05171
Plaintiff:
Scott W Humphreys
Defendant:
Securus Phone, More, A More and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Yakima County Jail DOC
as 1:2023cv03192
Plaintiff:
Derick George Ferguson
Defendant:
Yakima County Jail DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
