US District Court for the District of Columbia
Cases 121 - 130 of 57,284
HURT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01197
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KU KLUX KLAN and NRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HURT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COUNTRY OF MEXICO and COUNTRY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HERRING v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND L. HERRING
Not Yet Classified:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CHAMPION v. SENDWELL, INC.
as 1:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA CHAMPION
Defendant:
SENDWELL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
KRAVITZ v. REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL et al
as 1:2024cv01147
Plaintiff:
STEVEN J. KRAVITZ
Defendant:
REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL and REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
MAODI et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2024cv01146
Plaintiff:
SHIMON MAODI, TAMAR MAODI, SHANI ROSENBERG and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
RAY v. PRIVER et al
as 1:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
AMES RAY
Defendant:
DONALD PRIVER, JON LAWSON and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
