US District Court for the District of Columbia
Cases 111 - 120 of 57,294
TILLMON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv01176
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE D. TILLMON
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK v. NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH et al
as 1:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK
Defendant:
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
FLOWERS v. GOODMAN
as 1:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY FLOWERS
Defendant:
AL GOODMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLOWERS v. WEINER
as 1:2024cv01178
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY FLOWERS
Defendant:
RICKIE WEINER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLOWERS v. CLARY
as 1:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY FLOWERS
Defendant:
RAYMOND CLARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLOWERS v. SWARTZ
as 1:2024cv01181
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY FLOWERS
Defendant:
CONRAD SWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLOWERS v. PLYMOUTH ROCK INSURANCE
as 1:2024cv01180
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY FLOWERS
Defendant:
PLYMOUTH ROCK INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARTS CLUB OF WASHINGTON, INC. v. ACE FIRE UNDERWRITERS INSURANE COMPANY
as 1:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
ARTS CLUB OF WASHINGTON, INC.
Defendant:
ACE FIRE UNDERWRITERS INSURANE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ROSEBAR et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01158
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAWRENCE ROSEBAR and ERIC M. ROSEBAR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ALVIN GROSS, FORTY ACRES REALTY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
