US District Court for the District of Maryland Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 17,229
Thompson v. Foster
as 1:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
Keishon Javontae Thompson
Defendant:
Director B. Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gopshes v. Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00854
Petitioner:
Cokie Joe Gopshes, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Judge William V. Tucker and Clerk of Court Wayne Robery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00845
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Steward v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv00826
Petitioner:
Jermaine Steward
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
El-Bey v. Register et al
as 1:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Daniel Register, John Addison Howard, Jennifer B. Schiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El Bey v. Rubin
as 1:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El Bey
Defendant:
Julie R. Rubin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrington v. USA-2255
as 8:2024cv00794
Petitioner:
Tyrek Montez Arrington
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Holtzinger v. Rowe
as 1:2024cv00788
Petitioner:
Patrick Landon Holtzinger
Respondent:
Major Craig Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Passero v. Yes Care
as 1:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
Steven Gregory Passero
Defendant:
Yes Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
