Intellectual Property Cases

Trademark Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 39,293
4d Innovations, Inc. et al v. BPS Direct, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00445
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
D'Amato v. ECHL, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv00826
Plaintiff: David D'Amato
Defendant: ECHL, Inc. , Orlando Pro Hockey Operations, LP , Jason Siegel and others
Counter_claimant: Joe Haleski , Jason Siegel , Orlando Pro Hockey Operations, LP and others
Counter_defendant: David D'Amato
Mediator: Michael A. Brady
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope Inc v. BNP Media II LLC
as 3:2015cv01785
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
DHL Supply Chain Limited v. Foresite Systems Limited et al
as 5:2015cv02312
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Crutchfield Dermatology, P.A. v. Sensus Healthcare, LLC
as 0:2015cv02535
Plaintiff: Crutchfield Dermatology, P.A.
Defendant: Sensus Healthcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Pipeline Inc. v. Pipelinewomen LLC
as 4:2015cv00390
Plaintiff: Pipeline Inc.
Defendant: Pipelinewomen LLC
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Crutchfield Dermatology, P.A. et al v. Sensus Healthcare, LLC
as 0:2015cv02538
Plaintiff: Crutchfield Dermatology, P.A., Charles E. Crutchfield, III
Defendant: Sensus Healthcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Topo Athletic LLC v. Topo Designs LLC, and AMER Sports Winter & Outdoor Company
as 1:2015cv11896
Plaintiff: Topo Athletic LLC
Defendant: Topo Designs LLC, AMER Sports Winter & Outdoor Company
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
Perfetti Van Melle USA Inc. et al v. Midwest Processing, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv04093
Plaintiff: Perfetti Van Melle USA Inc. , Perfetti Van Melle Benelux B.V.
Defendant: Midwest Processing, LLC, Dexter Jorgensen
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.