US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Real Property Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 293
USA v. Burdan et al
as 5:2008cv00106
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Junior O Burdan and Brenda K Burdan
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Bank of America N A v. Eagle et al
as 4:2008cv00223
Plaintiff:
Bank of America N A
Defendant:
Benjamin L Eagle, McCarthy Centennial Consultants and Olandis Moore
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA et al v. Davis
as 5:2008cv00021
Plaintiff:
USA and Department of Agriculture
Defendant:
Constance J Davis
Counter Claimant:
Constance J Davis
Counter Defendant:
USA and Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
USA v. Crockett et al
as 3:2008cv00001
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Floyd Crockett, Patsy J Yates, Harrell G Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
USA v. Caery et al
as 2:2007cv00143
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Jerry Linden Caery, Jr, Timothy J Leathers, Cunningham Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
USA v. Key et al
as 2:2007cv00139
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Billy Gene Key, Sr, Barbara L Key and Allen Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
RB Consulting Inc v. Dye-Smith et al
as 4:2007cv00870
Plaintiff:
RB Consulting Inc
Defendant:
Billie Dye-Smith and Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
USA v. Dotson et al
as 2:2007cv00083
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Melvin D Dotson and Barbara A Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
USA v. Tallent et al
as 4:2007cv00520
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Faron Lee Tallent and Regions Bank N A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
USA v. Jordan et al
as 5:2007cv00092
Plaintiff:
USA and USA
Defendant:
Pearle Mae Jordan, Gwendolyn Stephenson, Kent Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
