Arkansas Real Property Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 244
Staggs et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 1:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Kenny Staggs , Shelia Staggs and Kendell Lee Staggs
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company , Heartland Exploration LLC and XTO Energy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Felbermayer et al v. CitiMortgage Inc et al
as 4:2010cv01551
Plaintiff:
Shelly Felbermayer and Arnold Felbermayer
Defendant:
CitiMortgage Inc and CoreLogic Flood Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Capps et al v. XTO Energy Inc
as 4:2010cv01459
Plaintiff:
Louis Capps and Dernice Capps
Defendant:
XTO Energy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whatley v. ReconTrust Company NA et al
as 3:2010cv00242
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Whatley
Defendant:
ReconTrust Company NA and BAC Home Loans Servicing LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aamodt et al v. Norfork, City of
as 3:2010cv03088
Plaintiff:
Jason Aamodt and Maria Aamodt
Defendant:
Norfork, Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cotner v. Forest Oil Corporation
as 2:2010cv02129
Plaintiff:
Jeff Cotner
Defendant:
Forest Oil Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anco Construction Inc v. RSVP Hospitality LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00186
Plaintiff:
Anco Construction Inc
Defendant:
RSVP Hospitality LLC and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cross et al v. XTO Energy Inc
as 4:2010cv01097
Plaintiff:
Gary Cross and Howard Cross
Defendant:
XTO Energy Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
XTO Energy Inc v. Chesapeake Exploration LLC
as 1:2010cv00045
Plaintiff:
XTO Energy Inc
Defendant:
Chesapeake Exploration LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Breslow et al v. ReconTrust Company, N.A. et al
as 3:2010cv03055
Plaintiff:
Alan L. Breslow and Linda L. Shaffer
Defendant:
ReconTrust Company, N.A. and Attorney-In-Fact for BAC Hme Loans Servicing, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
