US District Court for the Central District of California Social Security Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 7,179
Ramirez v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01882
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Ramirez
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Matautia v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Theodore Kereti Matautia
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Camden Rose Billin v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01868
Plaintiff:
Camden Rose Billin
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Meza v. O Malley
as 2:2024cv01874
Plaintiff:
Jenna Meza
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Kelly Ann Willard v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv01877
Plaintiff:
Kelly Ann Willard
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ahmad Lewis v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Lewis
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ahmad Lewis v. Martin J. O Malley
as 2:2024cv01794
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Lewis
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Terence Dawson v. Martin J. OMalley
as 2:2024cv01799
Plaintiff:
Terence Dawson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Daniel Cedillo v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01771
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cedillo
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Michael A. Hermogeno v. Martin J. O Malley
as 2:2024cv01746
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Hermogeno
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
