US District Court for the Central District of California
Cases 31 - 40 of 307,587
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00882
Petitioner:
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey and Michael S. Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ruiz v. Southern Tire Mart LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03429
Plaintiff:
Joey Ruiz
Defendant:
Southern Tire Mart LLC and Southern Tire Mart At Pilot LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Ramales v. LYMI Inc.
as 2:2024cv03398
Plaintiff:
Ulices Ramales
Defendant:
LYMI Inc. doing business as Reformation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Denise Carroll v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv03410
Plaintiff:
Denise Carroll
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
