US District Court for the Eastern District of California Other Statutes Cases

Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 91 - 100 of 284
Carrillo v. Swann et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00783
Defendant: Martha Hirschfield, Hope L Swann, Brent J. McIntosh and others
Plaintiff: Refugio Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Amalgamated Transit Union International et al v. United States Department Of Labor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00953
Plaintiff: Amalgamated Transit Union Local 192, Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1575, Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1277 and others
Defendant: Patrick Pizzella and United States Department of Labor
Intervenor: State Of California
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Klamath-Siskiyou Wildland Center et al., v. Grantham, et al., We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00850
Defendant: United States Forest Service, Barnie Gyant and Patricia A. Grantham
Plaintiff: Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Environmental Protection Information Center and Klamath Forest Alliance
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Environmental Protection Information Center et al v. Grantham et al
as 2:2020at00408
Defendant: United States Forest Service and Patricia A. Grantham
Plaintiff: Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, Klamath Forest Alliance and Environmental Protection Information Center
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, et al. v. Ross, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00431
Intervenor: Provident Irrigation District, State Water Contractors, Maxwell Irrigation District and others
Defendant: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wilbur Ross, Bureau of Reclamation and others
Plaintiff: Golden State Salmon Association, Bay.Org, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations and others
Petitioner: People of the State of California, California Natural Resources Agency and California Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor Defendant: Oakdale Irrigation District, Knights Landing Investors, LLC, South San Joaquin Irrigation District and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
California Natural Resources Agency, et al. v. Ross, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00426
Plaintiff: State of California by and through California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, California Environmental Protection Agency and California Natural Resources Agency
Intervenor: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, State Water Contractors, Westlands Water District and others
Defendant: David Bernhardt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and others
Intervenor Defendant: Sacramento River Intervenors, Oji Brothers Farm, Inc., Sutter Mutual Water Company and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Madera v. United States Department of State We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01798
Plaintiff: Cesar A. Quinones Madera
Defendant: United States Department of State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pit River Tribe et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02483
Defendant: Bureau of Land Management, Calpine Corporation, Department of the Interior and others
Plaintiff: Pit River Tribe, Native Coalition for Medicine Lake Highlands Defense, Medicine Lake Citizens for a Quality Environment and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Friends of Animals v. Bittner et al
as 2:2019cv02280
Defendant: Alan Bittner and United States Bureau of Land Management
Plaintiff: Friends of Animals
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Friends of Animals v. Bittner et al
as 1:2019at00827
Defendant: Alan Bittner and Bureau of Land Management
Plaintiff: Friends of Animals
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?