US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 141 - 150 of 154,106
Levi Strauss & Co. v. Worship Supplies et al
as 3:2024cv02958
Plaintiff:
Levi Strauss & Co.
Defendant:
Worship Supplies and Cheap Thrills Cycles PTY LTD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Liu v. UNM Rainforest Innovations
as 5:2024mc80122
Petitioner:
Weifen Liu
Respondent:
UNM Rainforest Innovations
Valley Pizza, Inc. v. Herbst et al
as 3:2024cv02922
Plaintiff:
Valley Pizza, Inc.
Defendant:
John A. Herbst, Allen M. Toy, Neil Cortesi and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7431 Taxpayer wrongful disclosure
Gustin v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
as 3:2024cv02917
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gustin
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Turner v. Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
as 3:2024cv02900
Petitioner:
Anthony Rico Turmer
Defendant:
Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Nichols v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 4:2024cv02914
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Nichols
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Hawes v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02930
Plaintiff:
Joel Hawes
Defendant:
Mead Johnson & Company, LLC and Reckitt Benckiser LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Price v. Saini
as 4:2024cv02899
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Price
Defendant:
Amrit Saini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
