District Court Cases in California
Cases 21 - 30 of 641,062
Danner v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv02858
Plaintiff:
Donald Danner
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Blackwell v. People of the United States of California
as 3:2024cv02806
Plaintiff:
Costello Blackwell
Defendant:
People of the United States of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02887
Plaintiff:
T. S.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robb v. Commissioner of Social Secuity
as 3:2024cv02885
Plaintiff:
Michael James Robb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Environmental Democracy Project v. Tesla, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02888
Plaintiff:
Environmental Democracy Project
Defendant:
Tesla, Inc. and Tesla Motors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Dalrada Financial Corporation et al v. Deprey Company et al
as 3:2024cv00849
Plaintiff:
Dalrada Financial Corporation and Dalrada Precision Parts, Inc.
Defendant:
Deprey Company, Steven A. Deprey, Pat Muench and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cox v. Kisco Senior Living, LLC
as 3:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cox
Defendant:
Kisco Senior Living, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
(PC) Harper v. Powell, et al.
as 2:2024cv01343
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
