US District Court for the District of Connecticut Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 6,243
Carmona v. Maryellen et al
as 3:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Carmona
Defendant:
Sliya Maryellen, Matthew J Pina, Joel V Ferreira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berrios v. Quiros
as 3:2024cv00803
Petitioner:
Edwin Eddie Berrios
Respondent:
Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saxon v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Robert Saxon
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Department of Corrections, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. State of Connecticut
as 3:2024cv00801
Petitioner:
Reginald J. Reese, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Newkirk v. Wong et al
as 3:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Gordon L. Newkirk, Jr.
Defendant:
Danielle Wong, Paul Hammick, Zackary Klomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Thillainathan v. USA
as 3:2024cv00789
Petitioner:
Ananthakumar Thillainathan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mitchell v. Osborn
as 3:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
Quincy Mitchell
Defendant:
Osborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arbelo v. Osborn Correctional Center
as 3:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Anthony Arbelo
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matava v. Bureau of Federal Prisons
as 3:2024cv00757
Petitioner:
John E Matava
Respondent:
Bureau of Federal Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
