Connecticut Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,234
Jean-Marie v. Popkin et al
as 3:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jean-Marie
Defendant:
Dean Popkin, John Doe, Blawie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berrios v. Quiros
as 3:2024cv00803
Petitioner:
Edwin Eddie Berrios
Respondent:
Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saxon v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Robert Saxon
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Department of Corrections, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valentin v. Osborn Correctional
as 3:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Jose Valentin
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmona v. Maryellen et al
as 3:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Carmona
Defendant:
Sliya Maryellen, Matthew J Pina, Joel V Ferreira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. State of Connecticut
as 3:2024cv00801
Petitioner:
Reginald J. Reese, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Newkirk v. Wong et al
as 3:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Gordon L. Newkirk, Jr.
Defendant:
Danielle Wong, Paul Hammick, Zackary Klomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thillainathan v. USA
as 3:2024cv00789
Petitioner:
Ananthakumar Thillainathan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mitchell v. Osborn
as 3:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
Quincy Mitchell
Defendant:
Osborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arbelo v. Osborn Correctional Center
as 3:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Anthony Arbelo
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
