US District Court for the District of Delaware
Cases 1 - 10 of 31,161
Kerr et al v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Greg Kerr, Twila Kerr and Robert Knowles
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
The Kraft Heinz Company v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 355
as 1:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
The Kraft Heinz Company
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 355
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Bhatti v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Sumaira Bhatti
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ACP Post Oak Credit I LLC et al v. Vesttoo Ltd., et al.
as 1:2024cv00304
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Ravindran v. BYJU's Alpha, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00389
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Houser v. J.F.H
as 1:2024cv00382
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Hopkins v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Derek Hopkins
Defendant:
Brian Emig, Racquel Hosten-Jones and Monroe Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
John Mezzalingua Associates, LLC v. Amphenol Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
John Mezzalingua Associates, LLC doing business as JMA Wireless
Defendant:
Amphenol Corporation and Changzhou Amphenol Fuyang Communication Equipment Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
Max Heating & Cooling, LLC v. Metro Express Service, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Max Heating & Cooling, LLC
Defendant:
Metro Express Service, LLC, Randy Murphy and Lora Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
