District of Delaware Cases

Cases filed

Cases 31 - 40 of 14,703
In re: Leaf123 Inc.(f/k/a Natrol, Inc.) et al.,
as 1:2015cv00387
Appellant: Citibank N.A. , London Branch
Debtor: Leaf123 Inc.
Appellee: Leaf123 Inc.
Cause Of Action: Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
iMedX Inc. v. Transtech Medical Solutions LLC. et al
as 1:2015cv00386
Plaintiff: iMedX Inc.
Defendant: Transtech Medical Solutions LLC., Sidney A. Weiss, Tracy L. Boesch
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Other Contract
Duchesnay Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
as 1:2015cv00385
Plaintiff: Duchesnay Inc. , Duchesnay USA Inc.
Defendant: Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Munson v. The Bankcorp
as 1:2015cv00383
Petitioner: John William Munson
Respondent: The Bankcorp
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kelly v. US Department of Justice
as 1:2015cv00382
Petitioner: Aaron Herbert Kelly
Respondent: US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority v. Teleport Communications Group Inc.
as 1:2015mc00134
Petitioner: District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority
Respondent: Teleport Communications Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: Petition to Perpetuate Testimony
Ernst v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00380
Plaintiff: Kevin Ernst
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Franks v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00381
Plaintiff: Michael I. Franks
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00375
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv00376
Plaintiff: Autumn J. Smith
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Tort Claims Act
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.