US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 19,117
Jamelson v. Phillips State Prison
as 1:2024cv01165
Plaintiff:
David Jamelson
Defendant:
Phillips State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Fayette County Jail (Detention Center)
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Alexis Ramos
Defendant:
Fayette County Jail (Detention Center)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Willis et al
as 1:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bailey
Defendant:
Fani Willis, Melynee Leftridge and Kristin Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lackey v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv01259
Petitioner:
James E. Lackey
Respondent:
Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Scroggins et al
as 1:2024cv01267
Petitioner:
Tiki Sims
Respondent:
Warden Steven Scroggins, Screven County Prison and Steven Scroggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crump v. McFarlin
as 4:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
Henry Earl Crump
Respondent:
Warden McFarlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lackey v. Unnamed
as 1:2024cv01123
Petitioner:
James Edward Lackey, Jr.
Respondent:
Unnamed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colston v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Bobby Jones Colston
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb and Warden Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colston v. Babb
as 4:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Bobby Jones Colston
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rice v. Jones
as 4:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rice
Defendant:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
