US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 101 - 110 of 115,372
Fraley v. United States of America
as 1:2024mi00033
Plaintiff:
Natasha Brown Fraley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Alan v. Fennell et al
as 1:2024cv02041
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alan and Joseph Alan Fennell
Defendant:
Joseph A. Fennell, 2003 Buick Century and contents, The United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Resicap Georgia Owner, LLC v. John Doe et al
as 1:2024cv02037
Plaintiff:
Resicap Georgia Owner, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe and Carique Spence
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
J.K. v. Main Street Lodging, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02031
Plaintiff:
J.K.
Defendant:
Main Street Lodging, Inc. doing business as Sundown Suites
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1589 Forced Labor, Sex Trafficking
Moore v. Bridgecrest Credit Company LLC
as 1:2024cv02036
Plaintiff:
Travontae Moore
Defendant:
Bridgecrest Credit Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
