Georgia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 8,555
Nicholson v. Colbert et al
as 4:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Nicholson
Defendant:
Lisa G. Colbert, Monique T. Baker, Jameeka Aiken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Holmes v. Clayton County et al
as 1:2024cv01461
Plaintiff:
Vakelvion Holmes
Defendant:
Clayton County and Officer Justin Stephens
Walker v. Google Company et al
as 1:2024cv01446
Plaintiff:
Mr. Willie Cal Walker
Defendant:
Google Company, infro@referleadersettlement.com, Horizon Acturial Settlement Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jackson v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Jackson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saldana v. Jaddou
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jose Saldana
Defendant:
Ur M. Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Fox More Staffing et al
as 1:2024cv01411
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
Fox More Staffing, Michael James, Michael Nigro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Messer Franchises LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01413
Plaintiff:
Eric Jackson
Defendant:
Messer Franchises LLC, Lynn Messer Hawkins and Paul Messer
Burroughs v. Wells Fargo Mortgage
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William S. Burroughs
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dukes v. Delta Community Credit Union et al
as 1:2024cv01375
Plaintiff:
Robert-Charles Dukes
Defendant:
Delta Community Credit Union, Bob Manning, Hank Halter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilstrap v. Federal Bureau of Investigations
as 1:2024cv01380
Plaintiff:
Sammy E. Gilstrap
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
