US District Court for the District of Idaho
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,252
Roselle v. Beaverhead County Attorney et al
as 4:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
William Clay Roselle
Defendant:
Beaverhead County Attorney, Beaverhead County Sheriff's Office, Clark County Prosecuting Attorney and others
Amerson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Joel Lynn Amerson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Capone v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Capone
Respondent:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Myers v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Clarence Everett Myers
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kurtz v. Angel Ramirez Framing, LLC
as 1:2023cv00471
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Tyree v. Melton et al
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Cindy Tyree
Defendant:
Kirk A Melton, John Justin May, Randslaw PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Legal Malpractice
Save the South Fork Salmon et al v. U.S. Forest Service
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Save the South Fork Salmon and Idaho Rivers United
Defendant:
U.S. Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cole v. Rocky Mountain Power, et al.
as 4:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Sherry Cole
Defendant:
Rocky Mountain Power and Idaho Public Utilities Commission doing business as PacificCorp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
