US District Court for the Central District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 11,037
Bell v. Leavenworth Penitentiary
as 4:2024cv04055
Petitioner:
Orlando Bell
Respondent:
Leavenworth Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parker v. Meador
as 2:2024cv02065
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lynn Parker
Defendant:
Jon Rodney Meador
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Greene et al
as 3:2024cv03075
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Brown
Defendant:
Brittany Greene, . Shoopman, . Render and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Western Illinois CC
as 3:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Alexander Hampton
Defendant:
Western Illinois CC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Adkins et al
as 2:2024cv02064
Plaintiff:
Jacob Daniel Young
Defendant:
Felicia Adkins, Jennifer Chacon, . Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv03074
Plaintiff:
Freddie Williams
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Latoya Hughes, Brittany Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haar v. McDowell
as 1:2024cv01129
Petitioner:
Jeremy Martin Haar
Respondent:
Nicole McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03073
Plaintiff:
Gene Brown, Jr
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Brittney Greene and Brandon Llewellyn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Hernandez et al
as 4:2024cv04052
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Nicole Hernandez, Jennifer Zyznar and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Dawns et al
as 4:2024cv04053
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
. Dawns, Greg Donathan, Cody Waterkotte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
