Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 44,581
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01158
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Harper v. Hart et al
as 3:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
Eazs A. Harper
Defendant:
C/O Hart, C/O Bent, Nurse Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Carbondale Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Carbondale Memorial Hospital, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demus v. Maldonado et al
as 1:2024cv03200
Plaintiff:
James Demus
Defendant:
Alfredo Maldonado, Anthony Plaid, Kim Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake v. Carlson
as 3:2024cv50153
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
Judy Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01151
Petitioner:
Ronald Jermaine Jackson
Defendant:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cook v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Glenn Cook
Defendant:
USA, Dr. R. Pass, L. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Risper v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Broderick Risper
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Brittney Greene, Brandon Llewellyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03094
Plaintiff:
Brittany Valencia Martin
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Jon Loftus, Melinda Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tilley v. Clark
as 1:2024cv01161
Petitioner:
Jimmy Tilley, Jr
Respondent:
Tiffany Clark
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
