Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 44,652
McLemore v. Downey
as 2:2024cv02105
Petitioner:
Kwatez Shadee McLemore
Respondent:
Michael Downey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Attaway v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv02107
Plaintiff:
Micheal Attaway
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amaya v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv03828
Petitioner:
Daniel Amaya
Respondent:
Chance Jones, Latoya Hughes and Kwame Raoulm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2024cv03822
Plaintiff:
Amireon Williams
Defendant:
John D. Idleburg, N. Kalfas and Gholar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50176
Plaintiff:
Dan Smith
Defendant:
Director Latoya Hughes, Warden Tarry Williams, Dr. Larry Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03795
Petitioner:
Lawrence Whitfield
Respondent:
Tom Dart and Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mosley v. County Of Will et al
as 1:2024cv03792
Plaintiff:
Johnathan N Mosley
Defendant:
County Of Will, Nicolas Keedy, Anthony Gomez Delacasa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
Jessie Williams
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Latoya Hughes and Richard Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bogan v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03799
Plaintiff:
Leah Bogan
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04085
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Cody Waterkotte, Jason Chenoweth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
