US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,924
RSS Feed | View as table
BROWN v. DIVISION OF INDIANA
as 3:2024cv00380
Petitioner: James Michael Brown
Respondent: Division Of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00371
Petitioner: Taurus Butler
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armour v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00356
Petitioner: Rickey R Armour
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jennings v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00344
Petitioner: Quinton Jennings
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrett v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00331
Petitioner: Ishmell Neal Garrett
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunigan v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00329
Petitioner: Lee Evans Dunigan
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00313
Petitioner: James Michael Brown
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00119
Petitioner: Terrance Brown and Terrance A Brown
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cobb v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00272
Petitioner: DeQuan Cobb
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Van Hawk v. Indiana Attorney General We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00259
Petitioner: Scotty Lee Van Hawk and Scotty Van Hawk
Respondent: Indiana Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?