Indiana Social Security Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 72
BATEMAN v. SAUL
as 4:2019cv00052
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
Deborah L. Bateman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005
REEF v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2019cv00021
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
HEIDI REEF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
WARRIX v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv02424
Plaintiff:
HELEN WARRIX
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GILLIAM v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv01652
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
DAWN M. GILLIAM
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and SSA-USAO (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Richardson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
Valerie Ann Richardson
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
ROBBINS v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv04500
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
KRISTI A. ROBBINS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and SSA-USAO (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WILSON v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00456
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and SSA-USAO (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
BOBBY J WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
UGO v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00327
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
ISABEL A. UGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HOUSE v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv02109
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE L. HOUSE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
PAIGE-ARMSTRONG v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01573
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
SHARON K PAIGE-ARMSTRONG
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005 Review of Agency Action-HHS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
