Kansas Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 700
Hirsh v. AMCOL Systems, Inc.
as 6:2020cv01147
Plaintiff:
James Adam Hirsh
Defendant:
AMCOL Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BNSF Railway Company et al v. Department of Revenue, Kansas, State of, et al
as 5:2020cv04026
Defendant:
Department of Revenue, Kansas, State of, David N. Harper and Mark A. Burghart
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, St. Joseph & Grand Island Railway Company, The, Nebraska, Kansas & Colorado Railnet and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11503
Altwegg v. Berman & Rabin, P.A.
as 2:2020cv02242
Plaintiff:
Mathew J. Altwegg
Defendant:
Berman & Rabin, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Sowell v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
as 5:2020cv04024
Defendant:
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Danny Sowell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sowell v. Online Information Services, Inc.
as 5:2020cv04025
Defendant:
Online Information Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Danny Sowell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stacker v. Focus Workforce Management, Inc.
as 2:2020cv02241
Plaintiff:
Pra'shawna Stacker
Defendant:
Focus Workforce Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Stone et al v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
as 2:2020cv02232
Plaintiff:
Tom Stone and Beverly Stone
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flinn v. C Pepper Logistics LLC et al
as 2:2020cv02215
Plaintiff:
David Flinn
Defendant:
Lanter Delivery Systems, LLC and C Pepper Logistics LLC
Hirsh v. Midland Credit Management Inc.
as 6:2020cv01104
Plaintiff:
James Adam Hirsh
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shields v. Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc.
as 2:2020cv02205
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Shields
Defendant:
Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
