US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
United States of America v. Bell
as 6:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Danny T Bell and Danny T. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Garvey Farm LP et al v. City of Elsmere, Kentucky et al
as 2:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Garvey Farm LP and Flagship Communities Reit
Defendant:
City of Elsmere, Kentucky, Matt Dowling, Gloria Grubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Dinter v. Miremami
as 6:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Bridgett Dinter
Defendant:
Rok Miremami
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Miller v. Alco Management, Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00208
Defendant:
Judy K. Devers, Alco Management, Inc, Alco Fairfax Partners, LLLP and others
Plaintiff:
Ron Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fall v. Whitton et al
as 2:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Fall
Defendant:
George Whitton, Sherry Hempfling, Richard Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Crank et al
as 2:2019cv00026
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Gus Crank and Penny Crank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mootoor v. Eastern Kentucky University
as 5:2018cv00645
Plaintiff:
Majenta Mootoor
Defendant:
Eastern Kentucky University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
F. v. Carter County Board of Education et al
as 0:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
B. F.
Defendant:
Carter County Board of Education and Kelley Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Pendygraft et al
as 5:2015cv00293
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Dannie R. Pendygraft and Rita Ballard-Pendygraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Andover Forest Homeowners Association, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00459
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Andover Forest Homeowners Association, Inc. and EMG Commercial Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
