Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 12,883
Capuano v. Crane et al
as 5:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Alfred Capuano, III
Defendant:
Ofc Tyler Crane and Graves County KY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Nurse Provider Smith, Comprehensive Correctional Care, Calloway County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caballero-Melgar v. USA
as 1:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Jorge Santos Caballero-Melgar
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Reid v. Harmon et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Reid
Defendant:
Stephen Harmon, Comprehensive Correctional Care and Nora Janes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaddie v. Knight et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
LaRico Dwayne Gaddie, Sr.
Defendant:
David Knight, Steven Carter, Darryl Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Krieg v. Warden of USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Eric Krieg
Respondent:
Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
William Hernandez
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cain v. Jesse et al
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Cain
Defendant:
Lt. Cayla Jesse, Ofc Cross, Ofc David Killop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Troy Gardner
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacy v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Marvell Jermaine Lacy, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
