US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 5,428
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Title III Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Piliego v. Montgomery et al
as 2:2023cv05075
Plaintiff:
Kayle J Piliego
Defendant:
Warren Montgomery, Will Macke, Taylor Nicholson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Voice of the Experienced v. Cantrell
as 2:2023cv05067
Plaintiff:
Voice of the Experienced
Defendant:
LaToya Cantrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Parker v. Chet Morrison Contractors LLC et al
as 2:2023cv05122
Plaintiff:
Stefano Markell Parker
Defendant:
Chet Morrison Contractors LLC and Morrison Energy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cobbins v. BRG Hospitality Group LLC
as 2:2023cv04923
Not Classified By Court:
Kevin Cobbins and brg hospitality
Defendant:
BRG Hospitality Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
