US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana Labor Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 883
Belk v. Tommy's Seafood, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv14730
Plaintiff:
Matthew Belk
Defendant:
Tommy's Seafood, Inc. and Thomas J Delaune
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207
Simmons et al v. K & E Resources et al
as 2:2019cv14040
Plaintiff:
Thelma Cosby and Carl Simmons
Defendant:
Jane Easterly Achord, K & E Resources, K & E Resources LLC and others
Rhea v. Chifici Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv13915
Defendant:
Chandra Chifici and Chifici Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Owen Rhea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Bookhardt et al v. Associated Wholesale Grocers Inc
as 2:2019cv13894
Plaintiff:
Ward Gonzalez, Paul Weathersby, William J. Bobbitt, III and others
Defendant:
Associated Wholesale Grocers Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Barnes-Dillon v. About You Sitting Service, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv13702
Defendant:
Robert Conley, Andrea Richardson and About You Sitting Service, LLC
Plaintiff:
Patricia Barnes-Dillon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Holts et al v. TNT Cable Contractors, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv13546
Defendant:
Udeo Services One Inc. and TNT Cable Contractors, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eric Holts
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 fi
Evans v. Petro Guardian, LLC
as 2:2019cv13513
Defendant:
Petro Guardian, LLC
Plaintiff:
Blake Evans
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Reese v. Royal Audio/Video Supply Co., et al
as 2:2019cv13451
Defendant:
Lori Gervais, Royal Audio Video Supply Co., Unidentified Party and others
Plaintiff:
Brad A Reese
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207
Knaps et al v. Quality Refractory Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv13419
Plaintiff:
Vincent Knaps
Defendant:
Freeda Jenkins, James Jenkins, Quality Refractory Service, Inc. and others
Isidore v. One Way Check Advance of Louisiana, LLC
as 2:2019cv13368
Plaintiff:
Markanna Isidore
Defendant:
One Way Check Advance of Louisiana, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
