Mariana Islands Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Basa et al v. Hall et al
as 1:2020cv00025
Plaintiff:
Edwin P. Blas and Francisco Nakatsukasa Basa
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, U.S. Marshal, Senator Food Service Contractor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shoiter v. Vincent S. Attao, Gregory Castro, Georgia M. Cabrera, Wally Villagomez
as 1:2019cv00021
Defendant:
John Doe, Gregory Castro, Wally Villagomez and others
Plaintiff:
Price Shoiter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guerrero v. Attao et al
as 1:2019cv00006
Defendant:
Romualdo Teregeyo, Jr., Jose Castro, Keith Lizama and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Q. Guerrero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guerrero v. CNMI Department of Corrections
as 1:2019cv00001
Defendant:
CNMI Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Francisco Q. Guerrero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Attao et al
as 1:2018cv00017
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ray
Defendant:
Vincent S. Attao , Gregory Castro , Georgia M. Cabrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aguon et al v. Attao et al
as 1:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
Steven Aguon , Ray Anthony Babauta , Joseph Barto and others
Defendant:
Vincent S. Attao and Gregory Castro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camacho et al
as 1:2018cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Babauta Camacho, Jose Santos and Xu Guang Li
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Vincent S. Attao, Georgia M. Cabrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camacho v. CNMI Department of Corrections
as 1:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Babauta Camacho
Defendant:
CNMI Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rios v. Attao
as 1:2018cv00004
Petitioner:
Anthony Rios
Respondent:
Vincent S. Attao
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manila v. CNMI Department of Corrections
as 1:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo A Manila
Defendant:
CNMI Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
