US District Court for the District of Maryland Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17,201
Newcomb v. Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center et al
as 1:2024cv01298
Plaintiff:
Dyron S. Newcomb
Defendant:
Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
Christopher Maurice Watts
Defendant:
Thompson and PrimeCare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Giangrand
as 1:2024cv01235
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Wilson
Defendant:
Robert Giangrand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Evans v. Sgt. Upole et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glenn Evans
Defendant:
Sgt. Upole, Ofc. Kock, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gozo v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv01270
Petitioner:
Makusha Gozo
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gross v. USA-2255
as 1:2024cv01247
Petitioner:
Donald Gross
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
King v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv01228
Petitioner:
Jordale King
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Horton v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01231
Respondent:
Jeffrey Nines, State of Maryland and Ricky Horton
Petitioner:
Troydrick Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
El-Bey v. Logsdon et al
as 1:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
William Logsdon, F. Farinloye, NDZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
