US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 232
Higdon v. Keolis Commuter Services, LLC.
as 1:2016cv11587
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Higdon
Defendant:
Keolis Commuter Services, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Badgett v. Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company
as 1:2016cv10543
Plaintiff:
Darren Badgett
Defendant:
Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Sebastino v. Springfield Terminal Railway Co.
as 3:2016cv30007
Plaintiff:
Gene Sebastino
Defendant:
Springfield Terminal Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Walker v. Massachusetts Bay Commuter Rail Company LLC et al
as 1:2015cv13507
Plaintiff:
Mark Walker
Defendant:
Massachusetts Bay Commuter Rail Company LLC, Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority and Keolis Commuter Service LLC
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Menezes v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv12348
Plaintiff:
Harriet Menezes
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Maziarz v. Brennan
as 3:2015cv30098
Plaintiff:
Mary A Maziarz
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennan
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Leposa v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (AMTRAK) et al
as 1:2015cv10922
Plaintiff:
Gregory Leposa
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp. (AMTRAK) and Keolis Commuter Services, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Cardwell v. Providence & Worcester Railroad CO.
as 4:2015cv40047
Plaintiff:
Brooks Cardwell
Defendant:
Providence & Worcester Railroad CO.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Bouvier v. Bush et al
as 1:2014cv14331
Plaintiff:
Carla Bouvier
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Hilary Clinton and John Kerry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Opper v. Providence & Worcester Railroad Co.
as 3:2014cv30155
Plaintiff:
Mark Opper
Defendant:
Providence & Worcester Railroad CO.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
