Massachusetts Other Statutes Cases

Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 189
Almeida et al v. Taxiarchos et al
as 1:2024cv10408
Plaintiff: Debra Almeida and Joseph J Santos
Defendant: John Taxiarchos, Rose Renee Fernandes, City of New Bedford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jeannite v. Shetrawski et al
as 1:2024cv10363
Plaintiff: Joel Jeannite
Defendant: Shetrawski, Captain Flynn, Brook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jeannite v. Flaherty et al
as 1:2024cv10364
Plaintiff: Joel Jeannite
Defendant: Maureen Flaherty, Charles Marshall, Judge Maura and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jeannite v. JKAM Badge 22
as 1:2024cv10367
Plaintiff: Joel Jeannite
Defendant: JKAM Badge 22
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Narrigan v. Goldberg
as 1:2024cv10107
Plaintiff: Thomas R. Narrigan
Defendant: Deborah B. Goldberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Guo
as 1:2023cv13194
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Defendant: Pro se litigant Hongnian Guo and Hongnian Guo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Latham v. Hastings
as 1:2023cv13190
Plaintiff: Lincoln Latham
Defendant: Quaseem Hastings
Jeannite v. Sorokin et al
as 1:2023cv12854
Plaintiff: Joel Jeannite
Defendant: J. Sorokin doing business as judge at supreme court and Young doing business as judge at supreme court
Latham v. Biden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv12834
Plaintiff: Lincoln Latham
Defendant: Joseph Biden
Guo v. Brookline Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv12704
Plaintiff: Pro se litigant Hongnian Guo
Defendant: Brookline Police Department, Kerry C. Keaveney, Kevin Gerard Mealy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?