Almeida v. Taxiarchos et al
| Ana Almeida |
| John Taxiarchos, Rose Renee Fernandes, City of New Bedford and Tallage Davis, LLC |
| 1:2024cv10704 |
| March 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Leo T Sorokin |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Kinsella, Jaylannie) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Cook, Savannah) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Ana Almeida Notice of Constitutional Challenge to State Statute (Gardner, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of New Bedford, Rose Renee Fernandes, John Taxiarchos, Tallage Davis, LLC Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMADC-10326618 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Ana Almeida. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Gardner, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
