US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Cases 1 - 10 of 65,709
Mohammad v. International Business Machines Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv12910
Plaintiff:
Khalid Mohammad
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation, Progress Software Corporation and Ipswitch, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Konish v. Greater Rochester Independent Practice Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12922
Plaintiff:
Brandy Konish
Defendant:
Greater Rochester Independent Practice Association, Inc. and Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rios v. Clinton Emergency Hospital
as 1:2023cv12915
Plaintiff:
Ray Luis Rios
Defendant:
Clinton Emergency Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Rios v. Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center
as 1:2023cv12916
Plaintiff:
Ray Luis Rios
Defendant:
Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Stephenson v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv12921
Plaintiff:
Zena Stephenson
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lee Cue v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2023cv12911
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Cue
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leroy v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv12912
Plaintiff:
Vicki Ann Leroy
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ellis v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2023cv12913
Plaintiff:
Edward Ellis
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dunlevy v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv12914
Plaintiff:
Margie A. Dunlevy
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
