US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 10,271
Ware v. St. Louis City Justice Center
as 4:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Andre T. Ware
Defendant:
St. Louis City Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ware v. Keefe Commissary
as 4:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Andre T. Ware
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennemore v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eldon Kennemore
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Donna Anderson, Stacey Neff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. USA
as 4:2024cv00459
Petitioner:
Robert J. Reid
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Skaggs v. Huhn
as 4:2024cv00457
Petitioner:
Micheal Lee Skaggs
Respondent:
Valerie Huhn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1455 Procedure for Removal Criminal Prosecutions
Shattuck-Knaebel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00454
Defendant:
Unknown Nichols, Missouri Department of Corrections, Bed Broker at Fulton Reception Diagnostic Center (2015) and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Shattuck-Knaebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pollard-El Jr. v. Allen et al
as 4:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Byron Pollard-El Jr.
Defendant:
Richard Adams Allen and Unknown Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Rico Paul
Defendant:
Brian Davis, Caleb Thompson, Justin Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. USA
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Dorothy E. Mays
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
