Missouri Contract Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 223
Miley v. American Shaman Franchise System, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00838
Plaintiff:
Raymond Miley
Defendant:
American Shaman Franchise System, LLC, Shaman Botanicals, LLC, Leigh Geither and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richards v. The Bunkhouse Bar & Grill et al
as 5:2021cv06142
Plaintiff:
Kristy Richards
Defendant:
The Bunkhouse Bar & Grill and Rachel M. Jackson
Garnishee:
The Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DRE Health Corporation v. BRM Trades, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00745
Plaintiff:
DRE Health Corporation
Counter Claimant:
BRM Trades, LLC and Chaim Benjamin Oberlander
Counter Defendant:
Isaac Bawany and Ahmed Ishaq Bawany
Johnny Morris' Wonders of Wildlife v. Bradshaw et al
as 4:2021cv00738
Plaintiff:
Johnny Morris' Wonders of Wildlife
Defendant:
Brad Bradshaw, Brad Bradshaw Law Firm and Jennifer Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 5:2021cv06123
Plaintiff:
jesse w. crump and Ashlee E. Crump
Defendant:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crump et al v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
as 5:2021cv06124
Plaintiff:
Jesse W. Crump and Ashlee E. Crump
Defendant:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Neal v. Florida Shaman Properties, LC et al
as 4:2021mc09039
Plaintiff:
Thomas J O'Neal
Defendant:
Florida Shaman Properties, LC, Brandon M Carnes and Katelyn Sigman
Courtney v. YRC, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00575
Plaintiff:
Victoria Courtney
Defendant:
YRC, Inc. doing business as YRC Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rollstock, Inc. v. SupplyOne, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00395
Plaintiff:
Rollstock, Inc.
Defendant:
SupplyOne, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Hanor v. Hanor
as 1:2021cv00034
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Hanor
Defendant:
Dicky G. Hanor
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2615
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
