Missouri Other Statutes Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 10,766
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv06029
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Cerno
as 6:2024cv03054
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Matthew Cerno
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Prosser v. Medica Central Insurance Company et al
as 4:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Christopher Prosser
Defendant:
Medica Central Insurance Company and John and Jane Does (1-18)
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Prosser v. SSM Health Insurance Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Christopher Prosser
Defendant:
SSM Health Insurance Company, Inc. and John and Jane Does (1-18)
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ozark MHP, LLC v. City of Arnold, Missouri
as 4:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Ozark MHP, LLC
Defendant:
City of Arnold, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Felder Peter King Estate of Ward Protectee et al
as 4:2023mc00727
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
