Nebraska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,637
Alvarado-Guerrero v. USA
as 8:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Gustavo Alvarado-Guerrero
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stump v. Nebraska, buffalo county court
as 8:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Logan Everett Stump
Defendant:
Nebraska, buffalo county court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. USA
as 8:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Elmer Rene Hernandez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Martinez v. Whitmire
as 8:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Adrian Gutierrez Martinez
Respondent:
Don Whitmire
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Npimnee v. Settles
as 8:2024cv00130
Petitioner:
Hope T. Npimnee
Respondent:
Shaun Settles
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sweatte v. Myers
as 8:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
Tori Sweatte
Respondent:
Micheal Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
O'Toole v. Danaher et al
as 4:2024cv03067
Plaintiff:
Ryan James O'Toole
Defendant:
Dan Danaher, Teena Lenger, Michele Wilhelm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kramer v. Probation
as 8:2024cv00123
Petitioner:
Tim Kramer
Respondent:
Probation
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Jeffereys
as 8:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Benjamin Hernandez
Respondent:
Rob Jeffereys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griswold v. Pillen
as 8:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Richard A. Griswold
Respondent:
Jim Pillen
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
