Nevada Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 5,220
Butte v. Washoe County District Attorney Office
as 3:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
David J. Butte
Defendant:
Washoe County District Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCandless v. Angel Oak Home Loans, LLC
as 2:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Tonia McCandless
Defendant:
Angel Oak Home Loans, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Williams v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Brandon Williams
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Gerryl Bennett, Nicolette Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christian v. Frierson
as 2:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Eric Leon Christian
Defendant:
Jason Frierson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cleveland v. Flores et al
as 2:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cleveland
Defendant:
Andrew Flores, Larry Palmer and Kimberly Fruth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Woods v. Investment Realty Advisons
as 2:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Terryett O. Woods
Defendant:
Investment Realty Advisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. D.O.N. et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
John M. Smith
Defendant:
D.O.N., Bean and James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Woods v. Store Front/ Valley Behavioral Health
as 2:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Terryett O. Woods
Defendant:
Store Front/ Valley Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Macias v. U.S. District Court Judge Kari A Dooley et al
as 2:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Carlos A. Macias
Defendant:
U.S. District Court Judge Kari A Dooley, U.S. District Court of Bridge CT, 06604, U.S. Dist. CT., of So. Dist. of Texas Houston Division TX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Barnes v. Spirit AeroSystems Inc
as 2:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Arthur Barnes
Defendant:
Spirit AeroSystems Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
